Sulakhan Singh v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Application in O.A. MA/80/2023 was dismissed in default as the applicant failed to appear despite multiple summonses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/80/2023 IN OA/102/2018 SULAKHAN SINGH Vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
05.04.2024 Item No.92
Present: None for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Sulakhan Singh
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court