The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant's MA for return of original documents, directed the Registrar to comply, and disposed of the matter. No substantive legal proposition was set forth.
Return of original documents; compliance by Registrar as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE I/C- PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT, AURANGABAD AT PUNE) ORDER SHEET THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE
Sr.No.04
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT-01
IN
MA No.46/2024
( Delivered on 09th October, 2024 )
Canara Bank
..Applicant
Versus
Ramnarayan Sharadprasad Shukla ..Defendant/s
Mr. Pratik Chandiwal h/for Mr. K. D. Pande - Advocate for the applicant.
None for respondent.
(Dilip G Murumkar) Place : Pune I/c-Presiding Officer Date: 09.10.2024 Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Canara Bank
Ramnarayan Sharadprasad Shukla
Dilip G Murumkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
