The Tribunal disposed of the MA because the application for preponement became infructuous due to the respondent bank issuing a fresh symbolic possession notice.
MA disposed of as infructuous due to fresh symbolic possession notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/35/2022 In SA No.67/2022 RAASHID AHMAD DAR Vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
15.05.2024 Item No.112
Present: Sh. Rohit Sapra, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Gaurav Thakur, Counsel for respondent bank.
File taken up today on the application for preponement filed by the applicant. Mr.Sapra states that the present application has been rendered infructuous as bank has issued fresh symbolic possession notice. In view of this, MA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room, after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
