Disposed
Idbi Bank v. Minal
DRTMA/26/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 27/02/2024 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in MA 26 of 2023 IDBI Bank Vs Minal |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Nehal Deshmukh i/b S.I. Joshi & Co. appeared for the Applicant. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that despite service no one appear on behalf of the Respondent. On perusal of Exhibit 12 & 13, it reveals that despite service on one appear on behalf of the Respondent. Therefore, they are hereby proceeded ex-parte. Heard Ld. Counsel for the Applicant. In view of the submission made in the present MA, the same is hereby allowed and delay in filing Chamber Appeal is hereby condoned. Chamber Appeal By way of the present CA, the Applicant is seeking restoration of OA. Heard Ld. Counsel for the Applicant. In view of the submission made in the CA, the same is hereby allowed and the order dated 27/07/2022 passed by Ld. Registrar is hereby set aside. OA is restored back to its original number. |
¶2
Chamber Appeal is also hereby disposed off. File be closed and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I -I I
¶3
DRT-I -I I
¶4
Sgj/-27
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court