Dismissed

Bal Subranun Raman v. Home First Finance Company India Private Limited

DRT5 Apr 2024MA/15/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge order dismissed an application for review of a settlement dated 07-10-2020. The court held the review barred as it was time-barred and the previous order had already been executed by the respondent, rendering the grounds for review impermissible.

What did the court decide?

Application for review of the order dated 07-10-2020 was rejected and dismissed.

Bal Subranun Raman versus Home First Finance Company India… — Writ and Judicial Review | DRT (2024)

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET

PAGE No.

CASE No.....

DATE	DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
MAL5124 0s104124	ShriRajmani Mishra,Advfor^theApplicant ShriHarjas SinghChabbra,Advfor^th RespondentNo.l On matter being takenwith^{consensusof bof} thesidematterheardfinally. ApplicantCounselinviting^{attentiononorde} dated07101120^passedby^{this Tribunalunde} SANo.6llll9disposingthe^{SA finallyo} consensusarrivedbetween^theparties. ApplicantCounselthroughthis^applicatio praysforleviewthetermsand^conditior settledthroughorder dated^{07101120submit} that theApplicantsuffering^{fromeyediseas} and wasundertreatment^atSankar Nethralaya Chennaiforthe^reasonhecoul notcomplythe termsoforder^dated0710112 settledbythis Tribunal ApplicantCounselfurther^{submitsthatthoug} executingorderthe^{Respondenthastake} physicalpossessionof^{propertynowtt} Applicantsreadytodepositall^defaulte amountas pertermsof^theorderdate 07l0lDA nndalso^{praysforrestoration(} possesslon. ApplicantCounsel repeatedly^{submitsthattl} Applicantisreadytodeposit^{totaloutstandir} amountandothercharges^also. ApplicanlCounselfurther^{submitsthatbefo} passingtheorder Applicanthasdepositt maximuminstallments and^{asper direction} , f

CONTD, ORDER.SHEET

PAGE No

GASE No.

DATE	DESGRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
	thisTribunalalso^{hasdepositedsubstantial} amounton the^{ground praysforallowingthis} MA.
	On theother hand^{RespondentCounsel} opposg$the prayer. Afterhearing both theside^{on perusaloforder} itrevealsthat on thestatementof^Applicant sidethisTribunalhas^{passedtheorderdated} 07l}ll20intermsandconditions^as enumgratedundertheorder^eventhenthe Applieanthasnotcomplied the^orderandnow filingthlsMA on01103124PraYS^for reviewingSreorderwhichistime^barredalso and groundonwhich the^{Applicantpraying} forrevipwtheorderwhich has^already executed. InopinionofthisBenchitis^{notpermissible} underthelawand^{procedure thereforeMAis} dismissed. Recordbeoonsigned to the^{record room.} (Ram lwasPatel) PresidinsOfficer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G)

Bal Subranun Raman v. Home First Finance Company India Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bal Subranun Raman v. Home First Finance Company India Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Surya Trading Company versus State Bank of India

Prism Hospital and Research Center Pvt. Ltd. versus Ms India Infoline Finance Ltd.

State Bank of India versus Shivkanti Prajapati W/O- Kamlesh Prajapati

Smt Monika Sharma Daughter of Shri Ashok Sharma versus Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited

Axis Bank versus Kailash Chandra Gendalal Patidar

Bank of Baroda versus M/S Swastik Traders