Allowed
Saheeda K v. State Bank of India
DRTMA/142/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Tribunal held that the petitioner complied with cost directions in MA Nos. 142/24 and 143/24. Consequently, it allowed both petitions, set aside the exparte final order against guarantors (Defendants 2 to 5), and restored the OA against them. The exparte order against the 1st Defendant Company was upheld as not exparte due to the filed written statement.
What did the court decide?
Cost directions complied with; MA No. 142/24 and 143/24 allowed. Exparte final order against Defendants 2 to 5 set aside; OA restored against them. Issue intimation certificate to Recovery Officer.