Madhav Trading v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's appeal as the applicant failed to appear despite multiple callings, operating in default.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed in default for non-appearance of the applicant.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
APPEAL/2/2024 MADHAV TRADING Vs BANK OF BARODA
16.07.2024 Item No.113
Present: None for the Applicant.
Sh. Umang Khosla, Counsel for the respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Madhav Trading
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court