State Bank of India v. Amit
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application for temporary injunction filed by the State Bank of India, this court allowed the withdrawal of the application, dismissing it as withdrawn due to a settlement between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Application withdrawn; dismissed as withdrawn being amicable settlement.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/s38 12023 STATE BANK OF INDIAVS AMIT CHAUHAN
Item no. 38
.L2.2023
Mr. Ashish Batra, Counsel for applicantbank. None for defendants.
i i iiiir, L'' i, I,I'J' ' : i:1:i,r:l:,{i. - I; , l.;i r.' ,.,i. L. i .:-l .1;: .,i, i i'l : ;, l:ii'i '.'.t.;i.' . i i';t,., ir',,:,i,I r' r. t.'. 1r I 1,.1 I . ilr. Ii_ t.tl.!il : ril, i i,i::;; ,i
I i ,':' 'lr l :. ' l:r!. iii: !r, ri,l ,,t ,. I !' i. li1rii
is taken through Video Conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submitsthat the matterhas n settled between thepafties andrequested for withdrawal of present TA.
uest allowed.
n view of the above submissionmade by the ld. Counselfor plicant bank, TA 53812023 is dismissed as withdrawn,being micably settled.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Amit Chauhan
Coram
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court