Canara Bank v. Venkatesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of an origin application filed by a bank for recovery. The tribunal accepted the bank's memo that the defendants settled the claim out-of-court and dismissed the application as settled without costs.
What did the court decide?
Origin application treated as settled out-of-court; dismissed without costs; refund of court fee ordered.
What the court decided
TA No.463 of 2023
08.09.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 08th day of September, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
TRANSFERRED APPLICATION No. 463 of 2023
(Originally filed before DRT- II, Chennai as OA No.211 of 2021 and thereafter transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as TA No.463 of 2023)
Canara Bank,
Rep. by its Senior Manager, Park Town Branch,
#22, Shydehams Road,
Chennai – 600 003.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
- respondent
P.R. Venkatesh
- respondent
M.S.P.M. Godvindaraj
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Punjab National Bank (Oriental Bank of Commerce) versus Aruvi Exports
Ms Ritty Departmental Stores Proprietor Mr Issac Ponsingh versus Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited
Union Bank of India versus Mrs Maala Ranghan And Others
Punjab National Bank (Oriental Bank of Commerce) versus M/S Meenu Travels Prop R M Muthiah