In this debt recovery matter, the applicant bank requested to withdraw its application after the defendants cleared their loan dues. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the application without costs.
Application dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement of dues by defendants, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
TA No. 411 of 2023 11.12.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 11th day of December, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
TRANSFERRED APPLICATION No.411 of 2023
(Originally filed before DRT- II, Chennai as OA No.07 of 2019 and thereafter transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as TA No.411 of 2023)
Union Bank of India*
Rep. by its Assistant General Manager Mount Road Branch Old No.95, New No.137 Anna Salai (Mount Road) Chennai – 600 002 …. Applicant
Vs
1. Mr.S.Venkatesan
S/o V.Srinivasan No.45, B-Block, Valleswaran Garden Kalliyappa Hospital R.A.Puram Chennai – 600 028
2. Mrs.V.Manjula W/o Mr.S.Venkatesan No.45, B-Block, Valleswaran Garden Kalliyappa Hospital R.A.Puram Chennai – 600 028 .... Defendants
*Amended as per orders in IA No.1434/2021 dated 17.12.2021
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. T.Narayanasamy
ORDER
together with future interest and costs.
2
TA No. 411 of 2023 11.12.2023
(Dictated to Steno (DD), transcribed by her corrected, signed and pronounced by me in open court, on this the 11th day of December, 2023)
Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
Union Bank of India
S.Venkatesan
V.Manjula
Ganapathi K.R.K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
