The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of an Applt No. 188/2022 filed by the State Bank of India against Mr. Sabita Ray, as the parties had amicably settled the matter.
Withdrawal of Applt No. 188/2022 allowed; the application was dismissed as withdrawn due to amicable settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/188s12022 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs MR SABITA RAY
10.11.2023
Item no. 29
Present: Mr. Akshat, Counsel for applicant bank. None for defendants.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
The ld. counsel for the applicant bank filed an application, vide Dy. No. 574412023, seeking the withdrawal of the present rA. Fufther, he submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and, accordingry, requested the withdrawal of the present OA.
Request allowed.
In view of the above submission made by the ld. counsel for applicant bank, T4/1885/2022 is dismissed as withdrawn, being amicably settled.
File be consigned to records
< ,tAr (SUSHIL KU MAf;. RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
State Bank of India
Mr. Sabita Ray
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
