Bank of India v. Mohan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a housing loan recovery case, the Tribunal allowed an application to appoint an Advocate Commissioner. The Commissioner was directed to compare notified copies filed by the bank with original documents held by the CBI to verify discrepancies, with the bank to bear costs.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Sh. Krishna Dutt as Advocate Commissioner to verify documents against CBI records; remuneration of Rs.15,000/-.
What the court decided
1
IA No.1318/23 in TA No.1299/2023
22.09.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K Presiding Officer
IA No.1318/2023 in TA No.1299/2023
Bank of India,
Usman Road Branch Rep. by its Constituted Attorney 8/17, Mahalakshmi Street, T. Nagar Chennai – 600 017
….Petitioner
Vs
- Mr. Mohan P
- S/o Mr. Punniakodi Naicker
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to verify documents with CBI custody
Whether to hear electricity bill, plaintiff? not found in text. not found in text.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bank of India
- respondent
Mr. Mohan P
- respondent
Mrs. Parimala M
- respondent
Miss Aarthi A
- respondent
M/s Hallmark Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court