Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's application to withdraw the present appeal and substitute the authorized representative after an amicable settlement.
IA No.34 of 2023 allowed for substitution; Present TA allowed for withdrawal; TAl was dismissed as withdrawn being amicably settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
TA/111s12022
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs KARAM SINGH BHATTI
16.11.2023
Item no. 40
Present: Sh. Kaushlendra Pandey, Counsel for applicant bank
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
IA No.34Lgl2O23 is filed by the applicant bank for substitution of authorized representative. The IA is formal in nature, hence, it is allowed.
IA no.34t212023 has been filed by the applicant bank for withdrawal of the present TA.
The Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that the matter is amicably settled between the pafties and the entire amount of settlement has been paid. He fufther submits that he wish to withdraw the present TA. Ld. Counsel for applicant bank also prayed for return of the original documents.
In view of amicable settlement, IA no.341212023 is allowed. TAlLLLS|2:O22 is dismissed as withdrawn, being amicably settled. Registry is directed to return the original documents after keeping the certified copies on records. All the pending IAs stand disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
e)': (susHrL KUT"RR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
c
STATE BANK OF INDIA
KARAM SINGH BHATTI
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
