Ms Maharaja Steels v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/97/2022 MS MAHARAJA STEELS Vs CANARA BANK
11.01.2023 Item No.55
Present: Sh. Vikas Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Saksham Pratap Singh, proxy for Ms.Rahish Pahwa, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Vikas Sharma, has made a statement at the bar that the matter has been settled between the parties and he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MS MAHARAJA STEELS
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court