Disposed
D D Jaiswal v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/94/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of Securitisation Application No.94/2022 on the respondent bank's submission that the account was closed and a No Dues Certificate had been issued. All interlocutory applications were also disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application and all interlocutory applications disposed of; file consigned to record room.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
17.11.2023
¶5
| S | r. No. | 98 SA No.94/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.94/2022 | ||
| D D Jaiswal ..Applicant Versus Canara Bank ..Respondent |
||
| Mr. Tushar Daware h/for Mr. P.S. Gaikwad - Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. V.R. Patil - Advocate for the respondent bank. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the account is closed and he has also placed on record the confirmation of the same. No dues certificate have also been issued on 06thSeptember, 2023. 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.94/2022 stands disposed off. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the interlocutory applications stand disposed off. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶6
[SBJ] (SA No.94/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
D D Jaiswal
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court