Dismissed
Ms Kailash Car Decor v. Punjab National Bank
DRTSA/907/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA907122 t7t08t23 |
ShriAshish Ganguly,AdvfortheApplicant ShriShreyasDubey,,AdvfortheRespondent MissAkshitaN4ohilay,Adv lbrthc l(espondcntNo.2 [.MatteristakenupforhearingonIA no.3423123applicationloramendmcntandIA No.3433/23datcd21t01123application[br condonationofdela1. 2.Onmatter being takenRespondent Counsel laisedanob.jcctionthatthisSnisnot tnaintainable [o hcal on meritsincreApplicants havenot compliedtheconditionspresidentas imposedbythisTribunalbyorderdated 25111122lordcpositingRs.10.000/-to condonc the dclay. 3. Onperusaloforderdated25llll22atl'ara' 7oftheorderitrevealsthatapplicationfor condonationol-clclalhasbccnalloucdsub.iect todcpositingI{s.10,(X)0/-aspcrdircction givenhorvevcrtilltoclayApplicantsidehas not depositedthe amount. |
|
| 4.OnbcingqucricclApplicanlCounse submitsthatearliersotleothercounselhac beenrepresentingthe matteroftheApplicantr rvhonevet'apprisedtotheApplicantsortohin] abouttoconditionsol'depositingItsl0'000/J thcrelbrcthisnlistakchas bccnhappcnc! howevertodayhcisleadytodeposittht irmountifcourtPcrrnit. |
¶5
PAGE No
¶6
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶7
CASE No
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Ashish Ganguly (Applicant Counsel)
- respondent
Shreyas Dubey (Respondent Counsel)
- respondent
Akshita N4ohilay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court