DRT-I Chandigarh dismissed the applicant's application when the respondent withdrew the notice under Section 13(2) SARFAESI Act and other proceedings. [49 chars]
Application dismissed as withdrawn following withdrawal of SARFAESI proceedings by respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/90/2022 SANJAY GOKAL @ SANJAY SHARMA Vs TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
17.05.2023 Item No.86
Present: Sh.Anup Prajapati, proxy for Sh.Harlove Singh Rajput, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.Puja Chopra, Counsel for respondent FI.
Ms.Puja Chopra has made a statement at the bar that respondent-Tata Capital has withdrawn the notice under Section 13(2) and other SARFAESI proceedings. Counsel for the applicant states that in view of the statement made by counsel for respondent, he does not want to pursue the present application. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as
withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Gokal @ Sanjay Sharma
Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
