Dismissed
Mrs Rekha Bhansali v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/90/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 08/09/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 99 of 2021 Mr Suraj Bharatkumar Parekh Vs Bank Of Maharashtra |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Puneet Gogad appeared for the Applciant. Ld. Counsel Mr. Puneet K. Gogad submits that he has already return the brief with the NOC, therefore, he submits now he is not a counsel in the present matter. Record reveals that no one has appeared on behalf of the Applicant after 29/07/2023 and today also no one is appearing on behalf of the Applicant. Therefore, the present SA is hereby dismissed in default. File be closed and consigned to record. P.O. DRT-I |
¶2
SP/-7
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Mr Suraj Bharatkumar Parekh
- respondent
Bank Of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court