The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Section 34 application by default because the applicant failed to appear on the last hearing date and subsequently on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-If, Delhi
s,.leol2022
MR ANIL SHARMA Vs INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD AND ORS
30.10.2023
Item no. 39
Present: None for applicant Sh. Shaswat Roy, Counsel for respondent FI no.1
Sh. Lalit Kumar, Counsel for respondent no.2
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
None appeared on the last date of hearing on behalf of the applicant. None appears today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hence, the present SA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
d
(susHrL KU MA'fi. RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
c
MR ANIL SHARMA
INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD AND ORS
MR ANIL SHARMA
SH S L KUMAR ROASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
