This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 04/08/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 88 of 2023 Zeal Logistic India Pvt Ltd Vs Rajkot Nagrik Sahakari Bank Limited |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Janak Shah appeared for the Respondent No.1. 1. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that in the order dt.15/06/2023 the presence of the Ld. Counsel for the |
|||
| Respondent has been recorded as the appear for the Applicant, therefore, he submits that the said order sheet may be corrected. 2. Looking to the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the Respondent and after perusing the record I find merit in the |
|||
| contention of Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.1 thus in the order sheet of 15/06/2023 for the appearance it may |
|||
| be read as the Respondent M. S. Mumtaz appearing for the Respondent and none appeared for the Applicant. |
|||
| 3. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent inform | |||
| that the Applicant fail to comply the | |||
| order dt. 12/05/2023 passed by this | |||
| Tribunal, therefore, the present S.A. is |
liable to be dismissed. 4. Looking to the facts the Applicant fail to comply the order passed by this Tribunal, therefore, in view of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court M/s. Prestige Lights Ltd. vs State Bank of India the present S.A. is liable to be dismissed hence dismissed accordingly. File be closed and consigned to record. P.O. DRT-I
SP/-26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal should be dismissed for non-compliance of Tribunal order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s. Prestige Lights Ltd. vs State Bank of IndiaDistinguished¶2
Zeal Logistic India Pvt Ltd
Rajkot Nagrik Sahakari Bank Limited
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court