The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitisation Application No. 88 of 2022 filed by Sarwar Fariyad Khan against Piramal Capital & Housing Finance for want of prosecution, noting the applicant's failure to make a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
03.11.2023 Sr. No.53
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
SA No.88 of 2022 Sarwar Fariyad Khan Vs. Piramal Capital & Housing Finance |
|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. On 27thOctober 2023, no representation was made by the applicant and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested |
||
| in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.88 of 2022 stands |
||
| dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Sarwar Fariyad Khan
Piramal Capital & Housing Finance
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
