Securitisation application disposed of as settled by the Debts Recovery Tribunal following the respondent lawyer’s statement that parties reached a settlement.
Securitisation Application disposed of as settled; all pending IA disposed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
15.03.2023
Sr. No.20 SA No.80/2023
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
|---|---|---|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.80/2023 | ||
| Dattatrya S/o Baliram Bargule ..Applicant Versus Mahindra Rural Home Finance Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. S.A. Wakure – Advocate for the applicant Mr. Rahul Bhutekar – Advocate for the respondent -FI The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel for the respondent-FI submits that matter has been settled between the parties and they are not proceeding ahead with the securitisation action. |
||
| 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent-FI, I pass the following order: ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.80/2023 stands disposed of as settled. B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
| The parties may download the order from the official web- site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK] (SA No.80/2023) Page 1 of 1
Dattatrya S/o Baliram Bargule
Mahindra Rural Home Finance Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
