The Single Judges State Lt. Gov, MP dismissed the Special Leave Petition as it was not subscribed to as the applicants did not appear.
The Special Leave Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No..
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA753/22 20t07 t23 |
NoncliuthcAppliclnt Shriltahul(iancshcc,Atlrlirlthel{esporrdcnt |
|
| On mattcr bcing takcnRespondent Clounsel by invitin_qattcntion onorcle'rdirtcd2710i22and l2l12122appliscdthatoncarlicroccasionlrlso Appl icants rvcrcabscr.rt. |
||
| l{espondcnl C'ounscllitnhelsLrhnritsthat thoughthcz\pplicants hlrctlcpositcdthc amoLurtaspel ordclol'tlrisl'ribLrnalhowcvcr havcnotdcpositcdrvithin tinteasglantcdby thc'l'r'ibunal. RespondentCounsel Iurlherpra1,sfbr lejcction ofthis SAsince Applicantsarcnottaking intelcst toprosccutcthis SAscriorrslr. |
||
| -[hismattcrhad bccnlistcdlrrrlcstclclay' houcvct'onlc(lLrcstol'[{cslrontlcnt('or,rnscl rrhocor.r'rcsIi'onrIllrtlpirlthi\nrlrtcthasbccn listcdlbrtodarthcn Applicantsidcisalso obligctorenrain prcscnttohcarthismattcr. |
||
| Lookingtopastconduct ol.Applicants regardirrgnon-appcaranccon27112122u'ttl l2ll2l22anclob.iectionlaiscdby'the [{cspondcnt('ounsclitro,ealsthirtApplicrrnts arclrotscrioLrstolllosccutc[hisS,,. |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No....
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER I'herefblcSA isstand disnrissedforrvant prosecLltion tlroorl. D lnaffixafl,atcty l)rcs idins()l'liccI I).ll.T,.labalpur (M.P&C.G) llccordbcconsignedUaU*^ =jst |
ol- REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| Lateron- | ||
| Counscllbr thcApplicuntShriA Chouclhar'1',appcalcclancipr.arslorraliingt nrattct'lillhcalins. |
ul IS |
|
| IIeinfurmedthatmattet.hasalrcadvb takenltorvet,otclueto,',,,,.,-r1.,;.,ar,.r,raa Applicant sidcntatrerhas bccrr ilisrnissed wantol'plosccul.ion. |
t1 ol' ol' |
|
| IIefurthcr passedcarlicr prays lbrrcvicrvingthcor |
er | |
| Ilclirrthcradvicc10 applicationaboutthcsante rurakcapplopri |
tc | |
| -slD lllamNiwa(l,atcl; l'rcsidin OUiccr D.ll.T,.labalpur (M.P&C.(;) |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No..
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER |
|---|
| REMARK |
|---|
gq{s, w..753 /2022 20.07.2023 3rrn{fi dqqqqrc ftrflfr d sTar sfuq-ffir sftqfi gn tsvRero *+-( E1T roqrr o'gr, renfro fatn v.d fg3rTilfi r$o fu-q1q-qr I {6 Td uri w fu eqi fu&ftqa d sr0r{fiT d efdft{i trilq oa fr,T{ B, fr qfi gd orBq-ffir arl 3I.Frd o-ufl' TqT fu snil+fi cH d 3TfDl-qffir +t vrgd.rffi t ({qrEq{ qqd fuqT.TqT, frtE t fiqr.{d fugqqenq s( gd d, {e- orrnTqfrfufr TSi ftqr rr+1t
3niqo orEr{ffirgRr q6 cft Gr+.rd 6{rqr rqT fu s€[ffq3rfgqffir frrrcrq +{ sqRerf, sYfr t t
srE{ffiT +t s-qrq +qED) 3rEd ar qftfufr {SmT{ frrd qH d frqq i Wt qqt fuEr.r{ +ft rc'q dT orfu{frT ErEr ft-d dr 3fqrrfl 6rTgT.rqr fuqoqrr d 5c< efu+mt 4 vgd.rffi i s+qftI-d fuqr B fd erq $1q+-{q d ftfl{E\ qd of {q-ql a-ecfr-f,fl{ d sfld sRT fr st got t,gs @r{u1 31q dgo ,til- ofqfr {S-mT{ r-fr osqrqrdd t cfraT fr oem fu-fl 'rql t fu +rq Giln{fiqer C yarfi +qq.q. wgd d{rT e,n t qfu sf,.qrfr eIfLTo-fiI.fto dqqa 3nd@ GrBilfiT Erc- wgf, fttn.d srilfi q< r:=r+{ tg rrrno rfr t {g.fuq Grril{fi
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| qeT@if+tRrdfu-qrqrortfrfrErEqc. 3rri<q{ftrrfrdrlqerrqdofalfufrts rrq-flftddtlqerg.flri+t rn{rdt Grril{mqeTo1sqR€Tfrgrr cni{q dqrqqQdqiuto-{rr{-ofu-qrqq1 Gnifi{t+q?F{urdqnqgqrqs@TqroiBI |
||
| Ii :-. -'-2 s/b r#"#*l qET{i-{GrErorft S.ern.fr.q.q.gs uffi{r,Td |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shrimani Mudliar (via) Shri A Chouhan
DICC, Jabalpur
Nam Niwal
Hamir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
