In a sanctioned application heard on 09.06.2023, the Applicant failed to appear while the Respondent bank was represented. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default assuming lack of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/75/2023 M/S RAJINDERA AUTO SERVICES Vs INDUSIND BANK LIMITED
09.06.2023 Item No.37
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Gaurav Thakur, proxy for Sh.Sumit Batra, Counsel for respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
M/S Rajindera Auto Services
IndusInd Bank Limited
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
