Dismissed
Kajal Kumari Singh v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/75/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal Patna dismissed the section application as infructuous due to a settlement agreement, resulting in the respondent losing interest in the case.
What did the court decide?
The section application was dismissed as infructuous; all pending applications were dismissed; interim order was vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
|---|---|---|
| SA 75 of 2022 | ||
| 16.01.2023 | Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. None appeared on behalf of the applicant. Ld. counsel for the respondent has submits that the matter has been settled under compromise. Itappears that the applicant has lost the interest in the case. In such circumstances, the S. application is dismissed as infructuous along with all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. Consign the record. Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · P.o
- Order 2 — this page · P.o
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court