Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Section III application in default and an intervening IA for non-prosecution by the applicant.
Application and intervening IA dismissed in default; applicant permitted to file new applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Date of order or proceeding
20.04.2023
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
|---|---|
| SA 72 of 2022 | |
| None is present for applicant. Ld. counsel for the respondent is present. Shri N.K. Singh as proxy counsel on behalf of intervener who has moved an IA 128/2023 for impleadment in the S. application is present. Since, S. applicant is not present today also as he was not pursuing the case for previous dates also. S. application is dismissed in default and for none prosecution of the applicant. The present IA is also dismissed. However it is open to the applicant, in case of any grievance he may file suitable application permitted under the law. Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna V (Kaushalendra Yadav Presiding Officer |
Applicant
Respondent
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
