Meenu Kalia v. Bank of Maharashtra
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/72/2022 MEENU KALIA Vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
09.03.2023 Item No.38
Present: Sh. SC Prajapati, proxy for Sh.Nitin Grover, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh.SR Kajla, proxy for Sh.Anil Sharma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Prajapati, has made a statement at the bar that the matter has been settled between the parties and he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Meenu Kalia
- respondent
Bank of Maharashtra
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court