This order dismissed the applicant's petition shwanton despite peremptory orders due to the applicant's habitual non-appearance over multiple occasions. No substantive ruling is provided.
Dismissal of the appeal/writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THEOROER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA69t23 22106t23 |
NonelbrtheApplicant ShriVinay'-l'ripathi,Aclv fbrthe Ilcspondent Onmatterbeingtakenl{espondent Counselb1' invitingattentiononorder dated13106123 sLrbmitsthaton carlicr tu'ooccasionsalsono one appearcdonbchall'ot'theApplicanlsand inspiteofperemptot,vorder dated13106123 atsoApplicantshasnotappearedandpraysfor dismissalof thisSA. |
|
| Onperusalol'ordcrdated2803123and 13106123itreveals that theApplicantshadnot appearedhowevcrb1passingtheperernptorl orderthisnrattcrwas ad.iottrncdlortodaleverl thcnnooneappcarcdonbehallol'the Applicantsno\'lookingtorcgularnon appearanceoftheApplicantsidethismatteris bcingdismissedlirruantofpt'osectttiorl |
||
| I{ccorclbe cotisignecltother!'coIdroolll. | ||
| SD | ||
| (l{anrNiuas I)atcl) ri l'rcsidir I).R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
GONTD.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
