Shri Manjeet Rawat v. Bajaj Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The document provided is an unrecognisable Order Sheet containing garbled text, numerical dates, and symbols. No substantive legal text, reasoning, parties, provisions, or decided matter can be extracted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
EONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | OESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| g{T.q.650,/2022 | ||
| 15.12.2 | onilf,f,qeTqttfrt t froilcfts 415631fu-q-msqfuror sm-t-qrfrt-n@t*rtfr4qsgi GrB{trrsqRroI 1. slruss{tr\frFiqemeri6q3ng.o 1406/2022ftqrcn27.07.2022,ficilEr+3na-fi ed.q.,en$.g.sszelzozsfr{io06.12.2023, 1Qrrneiriqqeir$.q.saool2s23ftqioeo.rt. |
|
| 2023q{Eqrr-qrBtno*qorer+a-oq ftrqrfqft |
||
| 2. GrrisficeTgxrfrqio21.07.2022d umrz(r)rr{Sffi \r{e2oo2dcrqEnr}d eio,fnqaq-qtrursf,{q-frt-ogm q{+ffi g{ddci-il.fdtrtrrh-a o1Tgoffio) GrrrrkrottiuowqfuoTd-fuffslfuc-cq s1-il{f,rqdqerfrgr:renfrofrr}qHol lTdrqdrtgnqofu-qrryrtt 3. q-{-ruriqG-a1-didd-tns-qofrt} Tnqieiltfi3rff{ifrqiEoo.rz.zozsdff4q t {-ffi qa{rfu{ro2s.i0.2023ofAErf,l "<sup>U+Ati &ri{iltnrwrFdf,fo-flrrqr twg.rotrqofrti'r$rerrn3Tfifid qrtqqt {-ffi WtriTf,fiifi2s.1o.2ond ci-jlr{urttftti-628.i1.2023o<sup>rrqqqtttr$ orffidqRqHm'I{eTFrafu}qriot q-jtufu-qrpqlg ' |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGEINo
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| 4. {dqtDYUre-qd4-stggfuq o)erqrfrrdqri tgg.l-o'tfr-crqe+ srrilqq{dq-+-irrdnre{e-girtI |
||
| s. vc-rqrfrceTEril'tf,3nile{\q ordRqGild-q=ilo-rqsnrrgofuuqTgfi Bl |
||
| ? carEm:Td3il-iEqdfrs_qtrqo fuqHqT3rle{oTft-{r+TurAsTurir tr |
||
| 7. ildddRr{3T}EoGrfuq-frTil{r oil-qfuEftGtfuoTr-d-{oqelc{ur.rqa-qr vsorBq-cqg+lrofqfu,T-ddffi-fi#'A T$tfur.frq-$zozzIg-trwrfiffi.q rr{9rdrctqsrfiwqfuoT+il.frfiGrBq-.qd fuqrrqTBI |
||
| B. Gild-iloGrBq-fiTora-dBfu siliroceTo) u'Te-qoffi oTHFr qerorrqfusTd-h-osrfuq-cstidsntrri wEsraeHo2j.07.2022o)qAnq;wT u-gofuur.TqrworffieiiorEH*t fustsq-qfifld3r-flBIrsfiGiletnw e?Dw s-{gf,o-{itgqfuqo}erqroq n+-roro)gur EiEwgiq.riorGr_Tttr fu-qr;q1g, |
||
| e. s-dt-qrfrcetdMrrgerfrr},T_} ssngsGrfu--dBfdqrnqqtGtTcfufrG tfuqn-+qcuqe-i$ts@-**, qu-sQ-d$-drdsqerq-sqid-c_f.ceTi IP-, q-q1-6-2663e/zoztu-qnfo,q1en ffiq6offioze.or.zozzqrfrogoirrs |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court