Dismissed
Pannalal Shaw v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/66/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
¶2
Order Sheet
¶3
| Case No. SA | 66/2022 Pannalal Shaw – Bank of Baroda & Anr. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
| 24.11.2023 (Sl. No. 36) |
Mr. Siddhout Srivastava, Mr. Ritam Dhar. … For the Defendant Bank. |
|
| The Sarfaesi applicant is not present, nor represents by any counsel. |
||
| Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that on 13.04.2022 there was a submission on behalf of the sarfaesi applicants that they will settle the debt with interest within fifteen days. Learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that no settlement is made. Today the matter is fixed for hearing. |
||
| Today the sarfaesi applicant is not present. Hence, the sarfaesi application is dismissed for default. |
||
| (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer ac |
¶4
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Pannalal Shaw
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
AI extract
Ambuja Mohan Das
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court