I 1. Analysing the above facts, the only question arises for consideration is as to whether B schedule immovable property is the secured asset of the I't defendant bank. As stated above, conspicuously, no party produced the originals of the title deed before this Tribunal in this case. It is nobody's case that the said BC executed any undivided share in the land comprised in A schedule immovable property to the 3'd defendant or its nominees after retaining the proportionate undivided share in the land in proportion to the build-up area falling to their share comprised in A schedule immovable property. Going by the linearity of title as described above, the aforesaid BC gifted B schedule imrnovable property along with an area of 493 sq ft of the undivided right and interest in A schedule immovable property to the 4th defendant by way of Annexure A7 gift deed dated 05.,12.2012 bearing No.5560 of the SRo, Gandhinagara (Yelahanka) putting her in physical possession of the same and had delivered all the relevant documents of title to her. As per the recitals therein the title of the donor to the property conveyed is good, clear and marketable and the donor has full power to gift the same. It is the case of the 1't defendant bank that by virtue of Annexure All (Annexure Bl) sale deed dated 25.06.2014 bearing No.2752 of the SRO, Gandhinagara (Yelahanka) the said BC represented by his power holder, the 3'd defendant sold B schedule imrnovable property along with an area of 493 sq ft undivided share, right, title and interest and ownership in
