The Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Delhi dismissed the application in default of non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear on multiple dates, indicating disinterest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal_Il, Delhi
sAls4l2022 SH SHIV KUT,IAR GoEt Vs CANARA BANK
19.10.2023
Item no.35
Present: None for applicant. Mr' Navin K. Thakur, counser for respondent bank.
Matter is taken through V.C.
order sheet reflects that no one appeared on beharf of applicant since 04.07.2022. None appears today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing ln. .ur.. Hence, the present sA is dismissed in default fo, non--prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
-..^.:, s^,.
(SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
SHIV KUMAR GOEL
CANARA BANK
SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
