In a debt recovery proceeding, the applicant appeared through no one, raising a presumption of lack of interest in pursuing the case. The tribunal dismissed the stay application in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sA/s3/ 2023
MRS JYOTI RAIPUT Vs THE AUTHORI zED OFFICER GIc HOUSING FINANCE
30.11.2023
Item no. 20
Present: None for applicant
sh. vidhu sharad pathak, counser for respondent FI
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
None appeared on behalf of the applicant vide order sheet dated 11.09.2023. None appears today. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the case. Hencg the present sA is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to records.
sa (susHrL KUMA( RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICE& DRT-II, Delhi
c
v
Mrs Jyoti Raiput
The Authorised Officer GIc Housing Finance
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
