DIRT dismissed the original securitisation application in default for the applicant's non-prosecution after noting the absence of the applicant despite notices.
Original Application No. 51/2022 dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 11.04. Sr. No |
2023 .35 SA No. 51/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO. 51/2022 | ||
| Chigalappa Tukaram Wagh ..Applicant Versus Bank of Baroda ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Vakil - Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through VC. 1. In this matter the learned counsel who appears for the respondent-bank submits that the copies of the Securitisation Applications have not been served till date. 2. It is submitted that none appears before the Registrar on the last date i.e. 17thJanuary, 2023 for the applicant. 3. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER A. The Original Application No.51/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.51/2022) Page 1 of 1
Chigalappa Tukaram Wagh
Bank of Baroda
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
