Appeal challenging a sale notice was dismissed as infructuous due to lack of infirmities and prior compliance with a conditional order. The application was disposed of without costs.
Sale notice challenged in SA dismissed as infructuous; application disposed of without costs; interim orders vacated; pending IAs closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.A.501 of 2022 11.04.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 11th day of April, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
SARFAESI APPLICATION No. 501 of 2022
Mr.T.Udayakumar, S/o.Thukkaraman, Door No.3/2, North Madavilagam Street, Sirkazhi – 609 110. ….Applicant
Vs.
The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Sirkali Branch, PNB House, Trichy – Tanjore Road, Kailasapuram, Trichy – 620 014. ….Respondent
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s.V.Ramamurthi Counsel for Respondent : M/s.J.Arun Prasad.
ORDER
2
S.A.501 of 2022 11.04.2023
his client regarding compliance of second part of conditional order. Thus submitting Ld. counsel prayed for passing orders.
Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
Mr. T. Udayakumar
The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
