The Court disposed of I.A. No. 2840 of 2022. Regarding S.A. No. 47 of 2017 and I.A. No. 2841 of 2022, the Court dismissed them as withdrawn since the applicant settled the matter amicably.
S.A. No. 47 of 2017 and pending I.A.s including No. 2841 of 2022 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet (Continuation)
| CaseNo. SA | /47/2{)22 TapasAgarwala&Anr.-vs-ICICIBank Ltd. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dateof order QLderNo.03 oL1510112923 Itq!xq-06 8e |
Orderwithsignature ForApplicant:Ld.Adv. Mr.N.Debnath. ForRespondents:None. |
Officeaction withdate anddated Signatureof |
| Ld.Counselfor theapplicant hasfiledtwoI.As.I.A. No.2840of2022inS.A.No.47of2017which isaputup application. Since recordis putupI.A.No,2840of2022is disposed of. |
||
| I.A.No.2841of2022hasfiled bytheapplicant,in view ofthefactthattheapplicant availedthefinancefacility forasumofRs.5,30,000/-fromtheRespondentbank. Duringthependencyofthemattertheapplicanthave settled thematterwiththerespondentbankthroughcompromise anddid not wanttoproceedfurther withthis matter.Hence I.A.No. 2841ot2022alongwithS.A No.47of2017and pendingI.Aifany aredismissedaswithdrawnassetfled amicably. File beconsignedtotherecord room. |
||
| (Amr Presid inE ,L,7 |
2 issues framed by the court
"Whether the S.A. No. 47 of 2017 and pending I.A.s should be dismissed as withdrawn after settlement via compromise?"
"Whether file be consigned to record room after withdrawal?"
Tapas Agarwala & Anr.
ICICI Bank Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
