payment by the applicant within the time stipulated by this Tribunal shall vacate the interim order and liberty, to be with respondent bank to proceed further in accordance to law. As applicant had not complied the second limb of the interim order within the stipulated time, obviously there was no interim order, owing to which respondent bank had proceeded further and issued a sale notice since challenged in SA No.310/2023 by applicant. Even that SA is filed after conclusion of the sale and applicant paid 20% of the sale notice amount again belatedly after the conclusion of sale and not prior to it. Therefore respondent bank is rightful in proceeding further under SARFAESI and has not violated any orders of this Hon’ble Tribunal. The alleged purported payments caused by applicant herein is only in compliance of the interim conditions in both the challenges of the measures taken under Sec.14 as well as the sale notice and nothing was paid beyond that. Applicant has only been stating that they are ready and willing to discharge their debt and redeem their mortgage, but however did not do so, despite concluding the sale in favour of the Auction purchaser. Ld.Counsel for respondent bank submits that respondent bank has followed the procedure as warranted under law and had demonstrated their actions in the typed set of documents filed herein, after serving copies on the other side. Applicant could not make out any tenable infirmities in the procedure adopted by the respondent bank nor could rebut their documentary evidence.
