Jancyrani v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This application challenging a Notice for Auction Sale was withdrawn by the applicant's counsel as the sale had not taken place on the scheduled date.
What did the court decide?
SA dismissed as withdrawn without costs; interim orders vacated; pending IAs closed.
What the court decided
1
S.A. 421 of 2022 22.02.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
SARFAESI APPLICATION No. 421 of 2022
Ms. A. Jancyrani, D/o.Ashok, No.1, Sundaram 2nd Street, Vyasarpadi, Chennai – 600 039. …Applicant
Vs.
The Authorised Officer Union Bank of India Villivakkam Branch, 93, Red Hills Road, Chennai – 600 049. ….Respondent
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s.J.Prince. Counsel for Respondent : M/s.V.Sivakumar
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ms. A. Jancyrani
- respondent
The Authorised Officer Union Bank of India Villivakkam Branch
Coram
Ganapathi K.R.K
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court