The application was dismissed as infructuous due to withdrawal of the possession notice by the respondent bank, with all pending applications and interim orders held accordingly.
Application dismissed as infructuous; pending LAs vacated; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Office action taken with data
| Date of~rder or proceeding |
|---|
10.04.2023
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA |
|---|
| Order with the Signature of the Court |
| SA 411 of2022 |
Ld. counsel for the respondent has submits that the respondent has withdrawn the possession notice under challenged. On other hand ld. counsel for the applicant submits that such decision of the respondent bank has been communicated so far. In view of the statement grven on behalf of the respondent bank S. application no. 411/2022 has become infructuous. Accordingly the S. application is dismissed as infructuous alongwith all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website V Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer
Applicant
Respondent Bank
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
