Dismissed
Gora Dutta v. Punjab National Bank
DRTSA/410/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
S.A. dismissed for non-prosecution; pending I.A.s dismissed accordingly due to applicant's absence and lack of diligence.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
i1l
¶2
Debts Recovery TribunaI-III, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶3
Gora Dutta
¶4
vs
¶5
Case No. sA'l4tot2o22
¶6
PNB & Ors.
¶7
| Orderwithsignature | Office action dated signatureof partieswhen |
|
|---|---|---|
| OrderNo.6 2t.09.2023 |
Present: ForApplicant :None For Respondent:Ld.Counsel1.4s.A.Das |
|
| SA/410/22istakenupforhearing. Ld. counselforRespondentbankispresent. None ispresentfrom thesideofSAapplicanton repeatedcalls. PerusedthorderNo.5dated 18/09/2023passed bythistribunat.I Heard,Ld. CounselforRespondentbank. Considered. NoneispresentfortheSAapplicantto arguehiscase. ItappearsthatSA applicantis notdiligentand/orwillingto proceedwiththe SA/4lO/22. |
||
| Hence,ordered- | ||
| SA/41O122be andthesameisdismissed fornon prosecution. IA's,ifany,pendingarealsodismissedaccordingly. |
||
| (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer-DRT-3 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Gora Dutta
- respondent
PNB & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
KamalDe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court