In a default application under the SARFAESI Act where the applicant did not appear, the DRT dismissed the suit because the respondent represented that the account was regularized and all enforcement measures withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 30/11/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 41 of 2023 Mustakim Hakimuddin Kazi Vs Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Ltd Formally Known As Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one appeared on behalf of the Applicant. Advocate for Respondent present. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent inform that account is already been regularized therefore all the SARFAESI measures has already been withdrawn. Thus, he submits that nothing survives in the present SA. Since, no one appeared for the Applicant, therefore, present SA is dismissed in default. File be closed and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I |
Sgj/-22
Mustakim Hakimuddin Kazi
Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Ltd. Formally Known As Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd.
Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
