Disposed
Prabir Kumar Roy v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/406/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶2
Prabir Kumar Roy vs. Union Bank of India
¶3
| cas€No.SA/4 | 06/2023 PrabirKumarRoyvs.Union BankofIndia |
|---|---|
| DateofOrder | orderwithsignature |
| OrderNo. pt.24t05/2023 Sl.No.6 som |
Present: ForApplicant For Respondent A Naha,LdCounsel PKMukhedee,LdCounsel LdCounselfortheSARFAESIApplicant hasflledaninterim application bearingI.A,No,1227ot2023tothea.lngofI.A.No. 1226of2023challengingthesale notice dated 29/04/2023 withthesaledateot25/05/2023.LdCounselforthe Respondent Banksubmitsthatno salehastakenplacedue to wantofbidderandfurthersubmitsthattheI.A.filed bythe Applicantchallengingthe sale notice maybe disposedofalong with theS.A. SARFAESIApplicanthasfiled thisS.A.for takingcauseof action onthesale notice.IntheS.A.alsotheApplicanthaschallenged thepossessionnoticeforthatthecauseof actionwasnotmore than45days. WhenthesalefailsI.A.becomeinfructuous. Accordingly, I.A. No. 1226of 2023isdlsposedof.I.A,No.1227 belngtheputup petitionisalso disposedof. if theApplicantwantsto setflethe account, he mayapproachtheBank uponwhichtheBank may take decision inaccordancewithrules. S.A.isalsodisposedof as infructuous. (AmbujaMohSnb5<)' PresidingOfficer-in-Charge ORT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Prabir Kumar Roy
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Ambuja Mohan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court