Applicant bank sought withdrawal of stated application and refund of court fee. Tribunal held refund inapplicable because dispute was not settled, only application withdrawn. Application partly allowed.
SA dismissed as withdrawn; prayer for refund of court fee denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovely Tribunal-Il, Delhi
sAl4o3l2023 SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR VS PIRAMAL CAPITAL
22.Lt.2023
Item no. 11
Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Dubey, Counsel for applicant.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
lA no.254tt2}23
File be consigned to records.
(A (susHIL KUMpR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT.II, DCIhi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether court fee is refundable when the stated application is withdrawn but the dispute remains unsettled.
Sushil Kumar
Piramal Capital
Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
