The applicant sought to withdraw the securitisation application due to lack of interest in prosecuting. The Tribunal dismissed the application by order and consigned the file to the Record Room.
Securitisation Application dismissed for non-prosecution; file consigned to Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 2 S |
8.08.2 r. No. |
023 36 SA No.402/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.402/2022 | ||
| Bhairavnath Industries ..Applicant Versus TJSB Shakari Bank ..Respondent None for the applicant. None for the respondent The matter is taken through VC. 1. None appears for the applicant. Even after passed over nobody appears for the applicant. |
||
| 2. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: |
||
| ORDER | ||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.402/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the Record Room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.402/2022) Page 1 of 1
Bhairavnath Industries
TJSB Shakari Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
