The DT-II Delhi allowed withdrawal of SA 391/2023 as the matter was amicably settled between parties.
SA dismissed as withdrawn, being amicably settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i'r ir' 'i iil'i!
'r,,.i r: ;l : r, 1..
. , i .. . I : :
Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi
l- ,' .t | 'i ,: :ii 1 i :, lrr ll 1,,r ' ,,1i
sA/391 12023
ARUN KAPOOR AND DEEPIKA KAPOOR Vs EDELWEI
20.t2.2023
Item no. 14
Present Mr. Angad Mehta, Counsel for applicant.
Mr. Shubham Kanojia, Counsel for respondent FI.
Matter is taken through Video Conferencing.
The Ld. Counsel for applicant bank submits that the matterhas been settled between thepafties andrequested for withdrawal of the present SA.
Request allowed.
In view of the above submission made by theld. Counselfor applicant bank, SA 3gtl2}23 is dismissedas withdrawn,being amicably settled.
File be consigned to records
?-a+-.*a4 A (SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI) PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-II, Delhi
"t"
Arun Kapoor
Deepika Kapoor
EDELWEI
Sushil Kumar Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
