This order dismisses a securitisation application for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear twice without sufficient cause.
Securitisation Application dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IAs disposed accordingly; file consigned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 11.0 Sr. N |
1.2023 o.28 SA No.390/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.390/2022 | ||
| Shri Yogeshwar Pundalik Rathod ..Applicant Versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited ..Respondent None for the applicant. None for respondent-bank. 1. On the last date of hearing i.e. 15thDecember, 2022, none appears for the applicant as such in the interest of justice, a last chance was given to the applicant to appear in the matter. 2. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.390/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.390/2022) Page 1 of 1
Shri Yogeshwar Pundalik Rathod
Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
