Dismissed
Upendra Singh v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/367/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A sale application was dismissed as infructuous because the withdrawal of the matter faced in court being filed by the applicant counsel
What did the court decide?
Employee filed an application for setting aside auction sale (S. application)[:$.50%, abandoned, or dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Office action taken with data
¶2
•
¶3
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA | |
|---|---|
| Date of order or proceeding |
Order with the Signature of the Court |
| SA 367 of 2022 | |
| 11.07.2023 | Ld. counsel for the applicant submits that the auction sale has been challenged in this case but the sale could not take place. Hence the S. application has become infructuous. Accordingly the S. application is dismissed as infructuous alongwith all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. |
| Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website v Patna (Kaushalendra Yadav Presiding Officer |
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the S. application became infructuous as the auction sale could not take place despite being challenged in this case.
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court