Disposed
Mrs Kastur Bharat Savle v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/353/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The I.A. for review was disposed of as infructuous because no bid had been received by the Respondent Bank.
What did the court decide?
I.A. No.2052 of 2023 stands disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| 25.09.2023 | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No. 353 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate Mr. Rajesh Dubey for the Applicant. Mr. Sameer Ghonge, Officer of the Respondent Bank. |
||
| Officer of the Respondent Bank submits at the Bar that no bid has been received by the Respondent Bank, so, I.A. No.2052 of 2023, filed by the Applicant, has become infructuous. Accordingly, I.A. No.2052 of 2023 stands disposed of as infructuous. Now matter be put up before the Ld. Registrar on 11.10.2023 for filing Reply. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-II |
11.10.2023 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · P.o
- Order 2 · H K Kaushik
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court