Allowed

Ramshankar Shivhare v. Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd.

DRT8 May 2023SA/350/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed an application for change of counsel based on a vakalatnama and affidavit. Subsequently, it allowed the applicant's withdrawal of a suit following an amicable settlement, ordering the suit withdrawn and the file consigned to the record room.

What did the court decide?

Application for change of counsel allowed; application for withdrawal of suit allowed; suit withdrawn.

Ramshankar Shivhare versus Dewan Housing Finance… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | DRT (2023)

PAGE No

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET

GASE No

DATE	DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
sA350122 08t0s123	ShriNitinAgrawal,AdvandShri^Vinay Baragi,Adv fortheApplicant ShriAbhishekSingh,Advforthe^Respondent No.1 l.Onmatter being takenApplicant^Counsel praysforhearingfirstonIANo.l8l ll23^dated 28104123applicationfor^changeof^counsel' 2.ApplicantCounselby^{invitingattention} onaffidavitsupportedalong^{withapplication} submitsthatsincethe^{Applicantisnot} satisfiedwithearlier^{counselandhedecidedto} changetheearliercounsel^{andhasexecuted} vakalatnamainfavourof^{thepresent Counsel} andhisassociates. 3.Looking to^{vakalatnamafiledon01105123} itrevealsthat the^{ApplicanthasengagedShri} VinayBaragi andhis^{associatesadvocates} andalsoexecutedan^{affidavitsupporting} applicationfor^{changeofcounsel.} 4.Lookingto^{willingnessolsoleApplicant} this application^isallowed.
	5.PresentAppticant^{counselShriVinal'} Baragiis^{permittedtorepresentthismatteron} behalf oftheApplicant. 6.ApplicantCounsel^{byinvitingattention} onIANo.1876123^{dated03/05/23submits that} throughamicable^{settlement dispute regarding} loanaccount^{has already been settledonthe} basisofOTS^{schemeandfurtherprays for}

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET

PAGE No

GASE No

DATE	DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER	REMARK
	withdrawalofthis SAbyplacing letterof settlementdatedI1104123.
	l.OnbeingaskedRespondentCounsel submitsthatsincetheApplicantis withdrawingthisSAwithout anycondition thereforeheisno objectiononthesame. 8.Lookingtoprayerofthe Applicantside, applicationforwithdrawalisherebyallowecl andtheApplicantispermittedtora,ithdrarv thisSA.
	9.ThisSA withdrawn. isbeingdisposedofas
	10.Recordbeconsignedtotherecord room. AS Patel) Presidin Officer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) (

Ramshankar Shivhare v. Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramshankar Shivhare v. Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Sharma Ice and Products versus Bank of India

Fanindra versus Centrum Housing Finance Ltd.

Ms Central Academy International School versus Varthana Finance Private Limited

Bank of Baroda versus Mahendra Kumar Rathi

Ms Ad Constrcution versus Bank of India

Dheerendra Singh Kirar versus Bank of Baroda