Dismissed
praful j vora v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/342/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application to withdraw a Securitisation Application was allowed pending counsel's consent from the opponent.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application No.342 of 2023 dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| 13.09.2023 Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No. 342 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|
| Advocate Ms. Somya Tripathi proxy counsel for M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co. for the Applicants. Advocate Ms. Shradha Agrawal proxy counsel for M/s. Rajesh Law Asso. for the Respondent No.1 Bank. Respondent No.2 absent. Application bearing I.A. No.1965 of 2023, for withdrawal of the S.A., filed by the proxy counsel for the Applicants, stating that the account is settled between the parties and the Applicants wish to withdraw the S.A. Proxy counsel for the Respondent No.1 Bank has no objection for withdrawal of the S.A. So, I.A. No.1965 of 2023 is hereby allowed and accordingly, Securitisation Application No.342 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. All pending I.As stands disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co.
- respondent
M/s. Rajesh Law Asso.
Coram
AI extract
I/c P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court